Skip to content
PMPCAPM

Risk Response Strategies for Threats

Risk response strategies for threats are the five approaches available to address negative risks: avoid, mitigate, transfer, accept, and escalate. Each strategy aims to reduce the probability, impact, or exposure of a threat.

Share:

Explanation

When responding to threats, the project manager selects from five strategies. Avoid eliminates the threat by changing the project plan. Mitigate reduces the probability or impact to an acceptable level. Transfer shifts the negative impact to a third party (e.g., insurance or contracts). Accept acknowledges the risk without proactive action, either passively or with a contingency reserve. Escalate moves the risk to a higher authority when it falls outside the project scope.

The choice of strategy depends on the risk's probability, impact, cost of the response, timing, and stakeholder risk appetite. High-priority threats often warrant avoidance or mitigation, while lower-priority threats may be accepted. Transfer is common for financial risks through insurance, bonds, or fixed-price contracts.

After selecting a strategy, the risk register is updated with the chosen response, the risk owner, trigger conditions, contingency and fallback plans, and any secondary risks introduced by the response itself.

Key Points

  • Five strategies: Avoid, Mitigate, Transfer, Accept, Escalate
  • Avoid eliminates the threat; Mitigate reduces probability or impact
  • Transfer shifts impact to a third party; Accept takes no proactive action
  • Escalate moves risks outside project scope to higher authority

Exam Tip

Memorize all five threat strategies. A common exam trap is to offer "Eliminate" as an option—the correct term is "Avoid."

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Topics

High-yield topics our learners drill most before exam day.

Risk Register

The risk register is a project document that records the details of individual project risks, including their identification, analysis results, response plans, and current status.

Transfer (Risk Strategy)

Transfer is a threat response strategy that shifts the negative impact and ownership of a threat to a third party. The risk is not eliminated but the responsibility for managing it moves to another entity.

Burndown Chart

A Burndown Chart is a graphical representation of work remaining versus time in a Sprint or release, showing whether the team is on track to complete the planned work.

Resource Leveling

Resource leveling is a resource optimization technique in which adjustments are made to the project schedule to keep resource usage at or below a defined limit, often resulting in a longer project duration.

Stakeholder Mapping

Stakeholder mapping is the visual representation of stakeholder relationships, influence, interest, or other attributes using grids, matrices, or diagrams to support analysis and engagement planning.

Relative Estimation

Relative Estimation is an agile technique where work items are sized in comparison to each other rather than in absolute units like hours or days, providing faster and more accurate estimates.

Cost Performance Index (CPI)

Cost Performance Index (CPI) is an EVM efficiency metric that measures cost performance as the ratio of earned value to actual cost: CPI = EV / AC.

Schedule Performance Index (SPI)

Schedule Performance Index (SPI) is an EVM efficiency metric that measures schedule performance as the ratio of earned value to planned value: SPI = EV / PV.

Earned Value Management (EVM)

Earned Value Management (EVM) is a methodology that integrates scope, schedule, and cost data to assess project performance and progress objectively.

Part of

Risk Management

Study full domain →

Test your knowledge

Practice scenario-based questions on this topic with detailed explanations.