Skip to content
PMPCAPM

Alternatives Analysis

Alternatives analysis is a technique used to evaluate different approaches, methods, or options for accomplishing project work, helping the team select the best way to define and deliver the scope.

Share:

Know it well enough for the exam? Questions on Alternatives Analysis are scenario-based, not definitional.

Practice it free

Explanation

Alternatives analysis is a broadly applicable technique used across multiple knowledge areas and processes. In scope management, it is used during Define Scope and Collect Requirements to evaluate different ways to meet project requirements, deliver the product, or structure the project work. The goal is to identify the approach that best balances scope, cost, schedule, quality, risk, and resource constraints.

The technique involves identifying multiple feasible alternatives, evaluating each against defined criteria, and selecting the option that provides the most favorable outcome for the project. Evaluation criteria may include cost, time to implement, technical feasibility, risk level, resource availability, and alignment with organizational strategy.

Alternatives analysis is not unique to scope management. It appears in cost management (evaluating make-vs-buy decisions), schedule management (evaluating scheduling approaches), risk management (evaluating response strategies), and other areas. Understanding that it is a general-purpose analytical technique applied in many contexts is important for the exam.

Key Points

  • •Evaluates different approaches for accomplishing project work
  • •Used in Define Scope, Collect Requirements, and many other processes
  • •Considers cost, schedule, risk, feasibility, and other criteria
  • •General-purpose technique applied across multiple knowledge areas

Exam Tip

Alternatives analysis appears in many processes across the PMBOK Guide. On the exam, it is the answer when the question asks about evaluating different options or approaches to accomplish work.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Topics

High-yield topics our learners drill most before exam day.

Burndown Chart

A Burndown Chart is a graphical representation of work remaining versus time in a Sprint or release, showing whether the team is on track to complete the planned work.

Resource Leveling

Resource leveling is a resource optimization technique in which adjustments are made to the project schedule to keep resource usage at or below a defined limit, often resulting in a longer project duration.

Risk Register

The risk register is a project document that records the details of individual project risks, including their identification, analysis results, response plans, and current status.

Stakeholder Mapping

Stakeholder mapping is the visual representation of stakeholder relationships, influence, interest, or other attributes using grids, matrices, or diagrams to support analysis and engagement planning.

Relative Estimation

Relative Estimation is an agile technique where work items are sized in comparison to each other rather than in absolute units like hours or days, providing faster and more accurate estimates.

Cost Performance Index (CPI)

Cost Performance Index (CPI) is an EVM efficiency metric that measures cost performance as the ratio of earned value to actual cost: CPI = EV / AC.

Schedule Performance Index (SPI)

Schedule Performance Index (SPI) is an EVM efficiency metric that measures schedule performance as the ratio of earned value to planned value: SPI = EV / PV.

Earned Value Management (EVM)

Earned Value Management (EVM) is a methodology that integrates scope, schedule, and cost data to assess project performance and progress objectively.

Power/Influence Grid

The power/influence grid is a stakeholder classification model that groups stakeholders based on their level of authority (power) and their active involvement or ability to affect the project (influence).

Part of

Scope Management

Study full domain →

Practice Alternatives Analysis

Scenario-based questions with a full explanation on every answer — including why the distractors are wrong.