Skip to content
PMPCAPM

Cost-Reimbursable Contracts

Cost-reimbursable contracts are agreements where the buyer reimburses the seller for all legitimate actual costs incurred in performing the work, plus a fee representing the seller's profit.

Share:

Explanation

Cost-reimbursable contracts place the majority of cost risk on the buyer. The seller is paid for actual allowable costs plus an additional fee, so if costs increase, the buyer pays more. This contract type is appropriate when the scope of work cannot be precisely defined at the outset, such as in research and development, new technology projects, or situations with significant uncertainty.

The three main subtypes are Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), and Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF). Each differs in how the fee component is determined. All cost-reimbursable contracts require the buyer to have systems in place to monitor and audit the seller's costs.

Cost-reimbursable contracts provide maximum flexibility for scope changes and evolving requirements. However, they require more buyer oversight than fixed-price contracts because the buyer needs to verify that claimed costs are reasonable and allowable. The buyer should define allowable costs, audit requirements, and reporting standards in the contract.

Key Points

  • Buyer bears the majority of cost risk
  • Seller is reimbursed for actual costs plus a fee
  • Three subtypes: CPFF, CPIF, and CPAF
  • Best suited for undefined or evolving scope

Exam Tip

Cost-reimbursable contracts transfer cost risk to the buyer. They are used when scope is uncertain. The buyer must actively monitor seller costs. This is the opposite of fixed-price risk allocation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Topics

High-yield topics our learners drill most before exam day.

Burndown Chart

A Burndown Chart is a graphical representation of work remaining versus time in a Sprint or release, showing whether the team is on track to complete the planned work.

Resource Leveling

Resource leveling is a resource optimization technique in which adjustments are made to the project schedule to keep resource usage at or below a defined limit, often resulting in a longer project duration.

Risk Register

The risk register is a project document that records the details of individual project risks, including their identification, analysis results, response plans, and current status.

Stakeholder Mapping

Stakeholder mapping is the visual representation of stakeholder relationships, influence, interest, or other attributes using grids, matrices, or diagrams to support analysis and engagement planning.

Relative Estimation

Relative Estimation is an agile technique where work items are sized in comparison to each other rather than in absolute units like hours or days, providing faster and more accurate estimates.

Cost Performance Index (CPI)

Cost Performance Index (CPI) is an EVM efficiency metric that measures cost performance as the ratio of earned value to actual cost: CPI = EV / AC.

Schedule Performance Index (SPI)

Schedule Performance Index (SPI) is an EVM efficiency metric that measures schedule performance as the ratio of earned value to planned value: SPI = EV / PV.

Earned Value Management (EVM)

Earned Value Management (EVM) is a methodology that integrates scope, schedule, and cost data to assess project performance and progress objectively.

Power/Influence Grid

The power/influence grid is a stakeholder classification model that groups stakeholders based on their level of authority (power) and their active involvement or ability to affect the project (influence).

Part of

Procurement Management

Study full domain →

Test your knowledge

Practice scenario-based questions on this topic with detailed explanations.