Skip to content
PMPCAPM

Gold Plating

Gold plating is the practice of adding extra features, functionality, or work to a deliverable beyond what was specified in the project scope, typically done by the project team without customer request or approval.

Explanation

Gold plating occurs when a project team member or the project manager adds extras to a deliverable that were not requested by the stakeholder or included in the approved scope. While the intention is usually to impress the customer or add perceived value, gold plating is considered a negative practice in project management because it consumes time and resources without authorization and introduces risk.

The key difference between scope creep and gold plating is their source. Scope creep originates from stakeholders or external pressure pushing additional requirements into the project. Gold plating originates from the project team itself, voluntarily adding features or enhancements that no one asked for. Both result in work beyond the approved scope baseline.

Gold plating can lead to schedule delays, budget overruns, increased defect risk, and scope management issues. Even if the customer appreciates the extra features, the project has still consumed resources on unplanned work. PMI considers gold plating inappropriate because it circumvents the change control process and adds risk without stakeholder agreement.

Key Points

  • Adding extras beyond the approved scope without customer request
  • Initiated by the project team, not stakeholders
  • Consumes unauthorized time and resources and introduces risk
  • Considered inappropriate by PMI standards

Exam Tip

Gold plating comes from the team; scope creep comes from stakeholders. Both are bad. On the exam, if the team is adding unrequested features, the answer is gold plating.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Topics

Test your knowledge

Practice scenario-based questions on this topic with detailed explanations.