Skip to content
PMPCAPM

Compromising

Compromising (also called reconciling) is a conflict resolution technique where each party gives up something to reach a mutually acceptable solution, resulting in a lose-lose outcome.

Explanation

Compromising involves finding a middle ground where each party makes concessions. While it does not fully satisfy anyone, it provides a workable solution when collaborating is not possible or when a quick resolution is needed. Both parties accept a degree of dissatisfaction in exchange for resolving the conflict.\n\nThis technique is useful when the parties have relatively equal power, when a temporary solution is acceptable, when time pressure exists, or when the stakes are moderate. It is faster than collaborating and may be the best available option when a perfect solution is not achievable.\n\nPMI considers compromising a moderate approach — better than forcing or withdrawing, but less ideal than collaborating. The key drawback is that because no one fully gets what they want, the underlying issues may resurface later. It should be used judiciously when a full collaborative solution is impractical.

Key Points

  • Each party gives up something to reach agreement
  • Considered a lose-lose outcome by PMI
  • Faster than collaborating but less durable
  • Appropriate when parties have equal power and time is limited

Exam Tip

Compromising is a lose-lose because both sides sacrifice. It is better than forcing or withdrawing but worse than collaborating. Know when it is the most appropriate choice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Topics

Test your knowledge

Practice scenario-based questions on this topic with detailed explanations.