Skip to content
CAPMHard

CAPM Practice: Determine how to prepare and execute task management steps

Question 19 of 60 in Determine how to prepare and execute task management steps

Pick an answer below — you'll get the explanation instantly, no signup.

An adaptive team has been using a digital task board for 6 months. During a retrospective, they identify that the board has become cluttered with old cards in ambiguous states, the WIP limits are rarely enforced, and nobody updates cards consistently. What underlying issue does this reveal and what should be done?
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: The team's commitment to adaptive practices has eroded; a team-facilitated process reset is needed, re-establishing the purpose of each board element, re-committing to WIP limits and DoD, and implementing accountability mechanisms like daily board review in standups

Explanation

Board deterioration is a symptom of eroded practice commitment, not a tool failure. A process reset (facilitated by the Scrum Master) should: (1) review what each board element is for and why it matters; (2) clean up the board collaboratively; (3) re-agree on WIP limits, DoD, and update responsibilities; (4) establish simple accountability mechanisms (e.g., each standup includes a 60-second board review). The issue is team discipline and shared ownership, not the tool.

Key Concept

This question covers Determine how to prepare and execute task management steps under Determine how to prepare and execute task management steps (Agile Frameworks/Methodologies).

Share:

All 1,500+ CAPM questions are free

Sign up to track your progress, see detailed analytics, and get personalized study recommendations.

Sign Up Free