Skip to content
PMPMedium

PMP Practice: Determine Critical Information Requirements

Question 8 of 15 in Develop an Integrated Project Management Plan

Pick an answer below — you'll get the explanation instantly, no signup.

Sol Matsumoto-Reyes is leading an agile transformation project at Kilimanjaro Freight Co, a mid-sized freight company. The executive sponsor, who comes from a traditional operations background, insists on having a detailed 12-month roadmap with fixed scope and deadlines before authorizing budget release. However, the development team has identified significant technical uncertainty around integrating legacy warehouse management systems with new cloud-based tracking APIs. The team estimates they will learn critical architecture constraints only after the first two sprints. The sponsor has made it clear that without a comprehensive plan, funding approval will be delayed by at least two months, potentially missing the peak shipping season window. What approach should Sol recommend?
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: Develop a hybrid delivery approach with a high-level roadmap showing major milestones and business outcomes for 12 months, while keeping the first three months adaptively planned with two-week iterations to accommodate emerging technical learnings

Explanation

A hybrid approach balances the sponsor's legitimate need for business planning and budget justification with the team's need for adaptive planning in areas of high technical uncertainty. By providing a high-level roadmap focused on business outcomes and milestones while keeping near-term work adaptively planned, Sol addresses both constraints. This approach recognizes that stakeholders often need visibility into expected business value and timing for strategic planning, while still preserving the team's ability to learn and adjust technical implementation details as they discover architectural constraints. The key is transparency about what is fixed (outcomes, major milestones) versus what will emerge (detailed technical approach). This maintains organizational alignment while enabling the team to work effectively in an uncertain environment.

**Why not A:** Refusing to create a fixed roadmap and lecturing the sponsor on agile principles ignores the legitimate business need for budget authorization. Delaying funding by two months and potentially missing peak shipping season would cause real business harm. The PM should find a way to meet organizational governance needs while applying adaptive principles where they add value.

**Why not C:** Postponing the project start for a three-month technical spike to fully understand all architecture constraints wastes valuable time and delays market entry. The spike approach assumes complete certainty is achievable and necessary before planning, which contradicts the reality that some constraints will only emerge through actual development work.

**Why not D:** Creating a detailed plan with fixed scope and dates to secure funding, then quietly adapting the plan during execution, is dishonest and erodes trust. If discovered, this undermines the PM's credibility with the sponsor and the organization. Transparency about what is known versus uncertain is essential for maintaining stakeholder trust and enabling informed decision-making.

Key Concept

This question covers Determine Critical Information Requirements under Develop an Integrated Project Management Plan (Process).

Share:

This is 1 of 100 free PMP questions

Unlock 6,300+ PMP practice questions with detailed explanations, progress tracking, and exam readiness prediction.

Unlock All Questions