Skip to content
PMPMedium

PMP Practice: Promote the Shared Vision

Question 10 of 20 in Develop a Common Vision

Pick an answer below — you'll get the explanation instantly, no signup.

Nikolai Volkov-Sorokin is leading an agile team at Sourdough Signal Corp developing a carbon-tracking mobile app for small businesses. Three sprints in, team members are pursuing different priorities: the UX designer wants to focus on gamification features to increase user engagement, the backend engineers are prioritizing data accuracy and API integrations, and the product owner is pushing for rapid feature delivery to meet an investor demo in two weeks. During the last retrospective, team members expressed frustration that 'we're building different products.' Velocity has dropped 30% as the team debates priorities in daily standups. The product owner has asked Nikolai to 'just tell everyone what to do so we can move faster.' Which approach would be MOST effective for realigning the team around a common vision?
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: Facilitate a collaborative vision workshop where team members and the product owner co-create a shared product vision statement and success metrics that balance user value, technical quality, and business goals

Explanation

When a team lacks a shared understanding of what they are building and why, the most effective solution is to collaboratively develop that shared vision together. The scenario reveals the core problem is not unclear priorities or poor communication from leadership, but rather a fundamental lack of alignment on the product's purpose and success criteria. The team is working in different directions because they have not collectively defined what success looks means. A facilitated vision workshop brings all perspectives together in real time, creates psychological ownership of the outcome, and produces a shared reference point for future decision-making. This collaborative approach addresses the root cause: the absence of a common understanding that the entire team believes in. The closing fact that velocity dropped 30% while the team debates in standups confirms they need collective clarity, not top-down direction or mechanistic prioritization frameworks.

**Why not A:** Having the product owner simply clarify priorities in the backlog addresses the symptom but not the root cause. The team's 30% velocity drop and the statement that they feel they are "building different products" indicate a deeper alignment problem that requires collaborative vision-building, not just clearer task ordering.

**Why not B:** Scheduling one-on-one meetings and then creating a unified plan reflects a top-down approach where the PM synthesizes input rather than facilitating shared understanding. This approach may produce a plan the team complies with but does not create the psychological ownership and collective buy-in needed to realign a fragmented team.

**Why not D:** Implementing WSJF is a prioritization framework that helps rank features objectively, but it does not address the fundamental vision misalignment. The team's problem is not knowing what to build first; it is not agreeing on what they are building or why. A mechanical framework cannot substitute for shared purpose.

Key Concept

This question covers Promote the Shared Vision under Develop a Common Vision (People).

Share:

This is 1 of 100 free PMP questions

Unlock 6,300+ PMP practice questions with detailed explanations, progress tracking, and exam readiness prediction.

Unlock All Questions