CAPM Practice: Explain when it is appropriate to use a predictive, plan-based approach
Question 34 of 85 in Explain when it is appropriate to use a predictive, plan-based approach
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: Process the change through integrated change control to assess impact and obtain formal approval
Explanation
Even in predictive projects, approved changes can be incorporated — but they must go through integrated change control. The project manager evaluates the impact (time, cost, resources, risks), presents options to the sponsor and CCB, obtains formal approval, and updates the baselines and plan. The process protects both parties and ensures the change is fully understood before being implemented.
**Why not A:** Accepting a 25% scope increase without formal evaluation could severely impact schedule, cost, and quality. Even for client satisfaction, proper governance requires understanding the full impact before committing to significant changes.
**Why not C:** Rejecting the change outright because the project is underway is unnecessarily rigid. Predictive projects can accommodate changes through integrated change control. The project manager should evaluate the impact and present options rather than refuse the request.
**Why not D:** Adding work to the next iteration without changing the scope baseline is an agile practice incompatible with predictive methodology. In a predictive project, scope changes require formal change control and baseline updates, not backlog additions.
Key Concept
This question covers Explain when it is appropriate to use a predictive, plan-based approach under Explain when it is appropriate to use a predictive, plan-based approach (Predictive, Plan-Based Methodologies).
All 1,500+ CAPM questions are free
Sign up to track your progress, see detailed analytics, and get personalized study recommendations.
Sign Up Free