CAPM Practice: Demonstrate an understanding of product roadmaps

Technical feasibility informs roadmap realism. Including technically infeasible items or misjudging complexity creates credibility-damaging failures. Development teams and architects must validate roadmap items against technical constraints before commitments are made.

**Why not A:** Technical feasibility assessment evaluates whether planned items can actually be built, not whether existing documentation is well-written. Documentation quality reviews serve a different purpose entirely and do not address the core question of whether the technology, skills, and infrastructure exist to deliver roadmap commitments.

**Why not B:** While team skills are one component of feasibility, a full technical feasibility assessment is much broader. It also evaluates technology maturity, infrastructure readiness, integration complexity, scalability constraints, and whether missing capabilities can be reasonably acquired. Narrowing it to skills alone misses critical dimensions.

**Why not C:** Legal market assessment is a regulatory or compliance concern, not a technical feasibility evaluation. While legal considerations may influence product strategy, they fall under a different category of analysis entirely and do not address the technical viability of building planned roadmap items.