Skip to content
PMPCAPM

Kill Points

Kill points are predetermined decision points in a project life cycle where stakeholders have the explicit option to terminate the project based on performance, viability, or strategic relevance.

Explanation

Kill points are closely related to phase gates but carry a specific emphasis on the termination option. While every phase gate technically includes the possibility of stopping the project, a kill point makes this option explicit and prominent. The purpose is to prevent the sunk-cost fallacy, where organizations continue investing in failing projects simply because they have already spent significant resources.

At a kill point, the review authority evaluates whether the project still makes business sense. Has the market changed? Have costs escalated beyond acceptable limits? Has a competitor launched a similar product? Are the technical challenges insurmountable? If the answer to any of these questions undermines the project's viability, the project should be terminated, and remaining resources should be redirected to higher-value work.

Establishing kill points at the beginning of a project is a best practice in project governance. It normalizes the decision to stop a project, removing the stigma that often prevents organizations from making rational termination decisions.

Key Points

  • Explicit decision points where project termination is a primary option
  • Designed to prevent the sunk-cost fallacy
  • Evaluate continued business viability and strategic relevance
  • Should be defined during project planning as part of governance

Exam Tip

Kill points and phase gates are related but not identical. If the exam question emphasizes the decision to terminate a project, the answer is a kill point. If it emphasizes a general review and go/no-go decision, it is a phase gate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Topics

Test your knowledge

Practice scenario-based questions on this topic with detailed explanations.