Skip to content
PMPEasy

PMP Practice: Determine quality standard required for project deliverables

Question 1 of 5 in Plan and Manage Quality of Products/Deliverables

Pick an answer below — you'll get the explanation instantly, no signup.

Birch Okonkwo is managing a predictive project for Productive Mayhem Inc to develop custom aviation maintenance software for a client in the aerospace industry. The contract specifies that all deliverables must comply with DO-178C aviation software standards, which the client's regulatory body requires for certification. During quality planning, Luna needs to establish the quality standards that will guide development and testing throughout the project lifecycle. The development team has experience with general software quality practices but has never worked on aviation-certified systems. The client has provided the DO-178C documentation and emphasizes that certification failure would delay their product launch by at least 18 months. Which approach would be MOST effective for determining the quality standards?
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: Review the DO-178C requirements with the client and regulatory experts to define specific, measurable quality criteria that must be met for certification, then document these standards in the quality management plan

Explanation

In a predictive project with strict regulatory requirements, quality standards must be determined upfront by consulting with those who have authoritative knowledge of the required standards. The correct approach involves engaging the client and regulatory experts who understand DO-178C certification requirements to translate those regulatory mandates into specific, measurable quality criteria. These criteria must then be formally documented in the quality management plan to guide all development and testing activities. This ensures the team builds to the correct standards from the beginning, preventing costly rework and certification delays. The scenario's closing facts—that the team lacks aviation certification experience and that certification failure causes 18-month delays—make it clear that expert guidance and upfront clarity are essential, not something that can be deferred or figured out through trial and error.

**Why not A:** Scheduling a quality audit midway through the project delays the identification of gaps until significant work has been completed. In a regulated aviation environment where certification failure costs 18 months, discovering gaps halfway through would require expensive rework and potentially jeopardize the entire certification timeline.

**Why not C:** Asking the development team to independently research DO-178C requirements risks misinterpretation. The team has no aviation certification experience, and self-directed research without expert guidance could lead to incorrect quality criteria that only become apparent during certification review, causing costly rework and delays.

**Why not D:** Using the organization's standard software quality metrics supplemented by general aviation best practices from online research is insufficient for DO-178C certification. Aviation software standards are highly specific and technically demanding, and general metrics or online research cannot substitute for authoritative guidance from the client and regulatory experts who understand the precise certification requirements.

Key Concept

This question covers Determine quality standard required for project deliverables under Plan and Manage Quality of Products/Deliverables (Process).

Share:

This is 1 of 100 free PMP questions

Unlock 6,300+ PMP practice questions with detailed explanations, progress tracking, and exam readiness prediction.

Unlock All Questions