Skip to content
PMPMedium

PMP Practice: Tailor the communication approach to stakeholder preferences

Question 5 of 5 in Manage Communications

Pick an answer below — you'll get the explanation instantly, no signup.

Echo Sørensen-Gupta is managing a predictive project to upgrade the manufacturing execution system for Cascade Biotech Labs across seven distribution centers. The project sponsor, who manages operational performance, requests daily email updates on implementation progress at each facility, including detailed metrics on system uptime and error rates. The regional facility managers, who are key stakeholders responsible for maintaining production schedules, have complained that they are overwhelmed by project communications and have begun ignoring emails. They have explicitly stated they only want to be notified when critical decisions affecting their operations are required. The communications management plan currently specifies weekly status reports to all stakeholders. Dante has confirmed that no urgent issues require immediate stakeholder action, and the project is currently on schedule. Which approach should Dante take to balance these conflicting communication needs?
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: Send daily detailed updates to the sponsor while providing the facility managers with bi-weekly summary reports highlighting only items requiring their input or decisions

Explanation

The project manager should tailor communication methods, frequency, and detail level to meet different stakeholder needs rather than applying a one-size-fits-all approach. The sponsor needs detailed daily information to fulfill operational oversight responsibilities, while the facility managers have explicitly stated they only need critical decision-making information and are experiencing communication overload. Providing differentiated communication—frequent detailed updates to the sponsor and less frequent, filtered updates to the facility managers—appropriately balances both stakeholder needs without creating conflict. This approach respects the facility managers' stated preference to reduce communication volume while ensuring the sponsor receives necessary operational data. The communications management plan should be treated as a living document that can be adapted when stakeholder needs become clearer during execution.

**Why not A:** Escalating to the sponsor to override the procurement manager is adversarial and unnecessary. The PM should first attempt to educate and collaborate with the procurement manager to explain why different contract types are needed, rather than going over their head to force a decision.

**Why not C:** Using time-and-materials contracts for both vendors exposes the compliance database work to unnecessary cost uncertainty. The compliance migration has fixed regulatory requirements and well-defined deliverables, making a fixed-price contract more appropriate for controlling costs and ensuring accountability for that component.

**Why not D:** Sending daily detailed updates to the sponsor while providing bi-weekly summaries to facility managers does not address the question about contract types. The scenario asks about procurement strategy for vendors with different delivery approaches, and communication frequency is a separate stakeholder engagement concern.

Key Concept

This question covers Tailor the communication approach to stakeholder preferences under Manage Communications (Process).

Share:

This is 1 of 100 free PMP questions

Unlock 6,300+ PMP practice questions with detailed explanations, progress tracking, and exam readiness prediction.

Unlock All Questions