Skip to content
PMPEasy

PMP Practice: Inspire, motivate, and influence team members/stakeholders

Question 5 of 7 in Lead a Team

Pick an answer below — you'll get the explanation instantly, no signup.

Quinn Nakamura-Rivera is leading an agile project at Controlled Avalanche Co to develop a mobile app for mental health tracking. During the second sprint review, the product owner, Aryan Chattopadhyay, expresses frustration that the team is not moving fast enough and insists they should work overtime to deliver more features. The development team pushes back, stating they are already working at full capacity and that forcing overtime will lead to burnout and defects. Dante responds by saying he has budget pressure from executives and needs visible progress immediately. The team's morale is visibly dropping, and two developers have privately told Quinn they are considering leaving the project. What leadership approach should Quinn use to address this situation?
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: Facilitate a collaborative discussion between Dante and the team to explore sustainable ways to demonstrate progress while protecting team capacity and well-being

Explanation

In agile environments, the project manager acts as a servant leader who facilitates collaboration and removes impediments. This situation involves competing stakeholder interests—the product owner's budget pressure versus the team's capacity constraints—and requires a collaborative leadership approach. By facilitating a discussion between Dante and the team, Quinn can help both parties understand each other's constraints and co-create solutions that might include: re-prioritizing the backlog to focus on highest-value features, finding ways to demonstrate incremental progress to executives, or adjusting scope expectations. This approach respects both the product owner's legitimate business concerns and the team's need for sustainable pace, while building trust and shared understanding. The scenario's closing facts—team members considering leaving and morale dropping—make it clear that forcing overtime or ignoring the team's concerns would be destructive, while the product owner's budget pressure is real and cannot simply be dismissed.

**Why not A:** Supporting the product owner's overtime request would lead to burnout, increased defects, and likely accelerate the two developers' departure. Agile emphasizes sustainable pace, and forcing overtime when the team is already at full capacity would damage morale further and reduce long-term productivity.

**Why not B:** Escalating to the executive sponsor for a priority decision bypasses the PM's facilitation responsibility and creates a win-lose dynamic. The product owner's budget pressure and the team's capacity constraints can potentially be addressed through collaborative problem-solving without requiring executive intervention.

**Why not D:** Telling the product owner to respect self-organization and not interfere is confrontational and dismisses his legitimate budget pressure from executives. While the team's workload should be protected, the PM should facilitate understanding between parties rather than shutting down the product owner's concerns.

Key Concept

This question covers Inspire, motivate, and influence team members/stakeholders under Lead a Team (People).

Share:

This is 1 of 100 free PMP questions

Unlock 6,300+ PMP practice questions with detailed explanations, progress tracking, and exam readiness prediction.

Unlock All Questions