Skip to content
PMPMedium

PMP Practice: Distinguish various options to lead various team members and stakeholders

Question 7 of 7 in Lead a Team

Pick an answer below — you'll get the explanation instantly, no signup.

Tala Reyes-Aquino is leading an agile development team at Fractal Horizon Labs, a mobile gaming startup. During the sprint retrospective, several developers express frustration that their creative input on game mechanics is being dismissed by the lead designer, who insists on making all final decisions without team discussion. The team's velocity has dropped 35% over the past two sprints, and two developers mention they are considering leaving. The lead designer, a highly skilled veteran hired six months ago, believes their approach ensures quality and consistency. Tala has already confirmed with the product owner that collaborative design decisions are encouraged and align with the company's culture. What should Tala do to restore team motivation and engagement?
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: Schedule a private meeting with the lead designer to understand their perspective, then facilitate a team working agreement session where everyone defines how design decisions will be made collaboratively going forward

Explanation

In this recovery situation, the project manager must address both the relationship breakdown and the team's motivation crisis. The servant leadership approach in agile emphasizes facilitating collaboration rather than imposing solutions. By first understanding the lead designer's perspective privately, Tala demonstrates respect and may uncover valid concerns or misunderstandings. Then, by facilitating a team working agreement session, Tala empowers the team to co-create their decision-making process, which directly addresses the root cause: unclear expectations about collaboration. This approach rebuilds trust, restores team autonomy, and aligns with the organization's stated culture. The closing facts that make this clearly best are: the product owner has already confirmed collaborative decisions are encouraged, Tala has the authority to facilitate this conversation, and the team's declining velocity and retention risk demand immediate collaborative recovery action rather than escalation or punishment.

**Why not A:** Escalating to the functional manager before attempting direct engagement is premature and signals distrust. The PM should first address the issue directly through conversation and team-level processes, which is the agile servant leadership approach. Functional management escalation should be reserved for situations where team-level resolution has failed.

**Why not C:** Removing decision authority from the lead designer and distributing it equally is a punitive overreaction. It does not address the underlying behavioral issue and could alienate a highly skilled team member. The goal is to establish collaborative processes, not strip individuals of their professional role.

**Why not D:** Placing the lead designer on a performance improvement plan treats a collaboration issue as a formal HR matter. This is disproportionate and adversarial, especially before attempting a direct conversation to understand the designer's perspective and facilitate a team working agreement.

Key Concept

This question covers Distinguish various options to lead various team members and stakeholders under Lead a Team (People).

Share:

This is 1 of 100 free PMP questions

Unlock 6,300+ PMP practice questions with detailed explanations, progress tracking, and exam readiness prediction.

Unlock All Questions