CAPM Practice: Validate requirements through product delivery
Question 4 of 68 in Validate requirements through product delivery
Pick an answer below — you'll get the explanation instantly, no signup.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: Whether the completed product increment meets stakeholder expectations and acceptance criteria, informing backlog updates for the next iteration
Explanation
The sprint review is the primary product validation event in Scrum. Stakeholders see working software and provide feedback — validating that delivered features meet their needs and informing the backlog about what to build next.
**Why not A:** The sprint review is not a performance evaluation of individual team members. It focuses on inspecting the product increment and gathering stakeholder feedback. Individual performance discussions belong in one-on-one meetings or retrospectives, not in the review ceremony.
**Why not B:** While code quality matters, the sprint review is not a technical code review. It is a stakeholder-facing event where the team demonstrates working functionality. Technical practices and code quality are addressed through practices like peer code reviews and the definition of done, not during the sprint review itself.
**Why not C:** Velocity metrics and burndown chart accuracy are internal team planning tools, not the focus of the sprint review. The review centers on the product increment and whether it delivers value. Metrics discussions are more appropriate during sprint planning or retrospectives.
Key Concept
This question covers Validate requirements through product delivery under Validate requirements through product delivery (Business Analysis Frameworks).
All 1,500+ CAPM questions are free
Sign up to track your progress, see detailed analytics, and get personalized study recommendations.
Sign Up Free