CAPM Practice: Explain when it is appropriate to use an adaptive approach

'Managing with agility' means applying adaptive thinking and practices: iterating frequently, seeking feedback, responding to change, and delivering value incrementally. This doesn't require using any specific framework (Scrum, Kanban, SAFe). The specific ceremonies and artifacts are implementations of these principles — the principles themselves are what 'agility' means.

**Why not A:** Scrum is one implementation of agile values, not synonymous with agility itself. Rigidly following Scrum ceremonies "exactly as prescribed" can actually undermine agility if the team applies them without understanding — a risk Scrum itself acknowledges. Managing with agility is about mindset and outcomes, not strict adherence to any specific framework's prescribed rules.

**Why not B:** Holding standups at a consistent time is a logistical convenience that supports team coordination, but it is a minor operational detail — not what "agility" means at its core. A team could follow this practice while remaining entirely non-agile in how they plan, respond to change, and deliver value.

**Why not D:** The Agile Manifesto values working software over comprehensive documentation, but does not call for eliminating documentation entirely. Reducing documentation is an artifact of applying agile principles, not the definition of agility. A team could minimize docs and still deliver infrequently, resist change, and fail to incorporate stakeholder feedback.