CAPM Practice: Explain when it is appropriate to use a predictive, plan-based approach
Question 66 of 85 in Explain when it is appropriate to use a predictive, plan-based approach
Pick an answer below — you'll get the explanation instantly, no signup.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: Rough order of magnitude (ROM) estimate with -25% to +75% accuracy
Explanation
At project initiation, limited information is available, so estimates have wide ranges — typically ROM estimates with -25% to +75% accuracy (some sources cite -50% to +100%). As planning progresses and more information becomes available, estimates are refined to budget estimates, then definitive estimates. This reflects the cone of uncertainty in predictive projects.
**Why not A:** Bottom-up estimates require detailed work packages and activity-level information that is not available during project initiation. This level of detail comes during detailed planning, not at the initial concept stage when high-level estimates are needed.
**Why not B:** Parametric estimates using precise historical data require well-defined parameters and reliable cost databases. At initiation, project parameters are not sufficiently defined to support precise parametric calculations.
**Why not D:** A definitive estimate with plus or minus 5% accuracy requires detailed scope definition, complete work breakdown, and thorough analysis. This level of precision is impossible at initiation when the project is still at the concept stage with limited information.
Key Concept
This question covers Explain when it is appropriate to use a predictive, plan-based approach under Explain when it is appropriate to use a predictive, plan-based approach (Predictive, Plan-Based Methodologies).
All 1,500+ CAPM questions are free
Sign up to track your progress, see detailed analytics, and get personalized study recommendations.
Sign Up Free