CAPM Practice: Determine how to document project controls of predictive, plan-based projects

After defect repair, the deliverable must undergo re-inspection to: (1) verify the original defect was correctly fixed; and (2) confirm that the repair did not introduce new defects. Quality control requires that repaired deliverables re-enter the inspection process. Only after successful re-inspection can the deliverable be formally accepted.

**Why not A:** Archiving the deliverable and not re-using it wastes the investment in creating it. A defect does not render a deliverable permanently unusable. Once properly repaired and verified through re-inspection, the deliverable should proceed through the normal acceptance process.

**Why not C:** Accepting the deliverable without further inspection after repair is risky. The repair itself could be incomplete or could have introduced new defects. Quality control requires verification that the repair was successful before formal acceptance.

**Why not D:** Defect repair is a corrective action handled within quality control processes, not through the Change Control Board. The CCB reviews changes to the project scope, schedule, or cost baselines. Fixing a defect to meet existing quality standards is not a scope change requiring CCB approval.