CAPM Practice: Determine how to document project controls of predictive, plan-based projects
Question 80 of 85 in Determine how to document project controls of predictive, plan-based projects
Pick an answer below — you'll get the explanation instantly, no signup.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: At least one person designated as Responsible and one designated as Accountable for each work package
Explanation
For effective responsibility assignment, each work package must have at minimum: a Responsible party (who does the work) and an Accountable party (who owns the outcome and has final decision authority). Without clear R and A designations, work lacks ownership and decision-making becomes unclear. Consulted and Informed are valuable additions but the R and A are essential minimums.
**Why not B:** Budget, schedule, and quality metrics are important project management information but belong in the project management plan and work package documentation, not in the responsibility assignment matrix. The RAM specifically defines who is responsible and accountable for work, not its performance metrics.
**Why not C:** Start and finish dates belong in the project schedule, not the responsibility assignment matrix. The RAM focuses on assigning people to work packages with defined roles, while the schedule addresses when that work will be performed.
**Why not D:** A full team roster assigned to a work package is more detail than the RAM requires at minimum. The RAM needs at minimum one Responsible and one Accountable person per work package. Having the full roster assigned is desirable but not the minimum required information.
Key Concept
This question covers Determine how to document project controls of predictive, plan-based projects under Determine how to document project controls of predictive, plan-based projects (Predictive, Plan-Based Methodologies).
All 1,500+ CAPM questions are free
Sign up to track your progress, see detailed analytics, and get personalized study recommendations.
Sign Up Free