CAPM Practice: Demonstrate an understanding of the various project life cycles and processes

A predictive (plan-driven) approach is most suitable when requirements are clear and stable, the scope is well-defined, and there is low uncertainty. Construction projects with approved designs and permits fit this profile well, allowing for sequential phase completion.

**Why not A:** An agile approach is designed for projects with high uncertainty and evolving requirements. This construction project has well-defined requirements, a complete design, and an approved permit, meaning there is low uncertainty that does not warrant an agile approach.

**Why not B:** A hybrid approach combines predictive and adaptive elements, which is useful when some aspects of the project have uncertainty. With all requirements defined, design complete, and permits approved, there is no compelling reason to introduce adaptive sprints.

**Why not C:** Stating that construction projects always benefit from iterative delivery is incorrect. Construction follows a sequential process where foundations must be laid before walls, which must be built before roofing. The well-defined scope makes a predictive approach natural and efficient.