CAPM Practice: Demonstrate an understanding of a project management plan schedule
Question 78 of 85 in Demonstrate an understanding of a project management plan schedule
Pick an answer below — you'll get the explanation instantly, no signup.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: Evaluate resource leveling, fast tracking, or scope reduction, and escalate the resource conflict to the sponsor or resource manager for resolution
Explanation
Resource conflicts on the critical path are high-priority risks. The project manager should: evaluate whether resource leveling (adjusting the schedule) can resolve the conflict; consider whether fast tracking can reduce the period needing the architect; explore alternatives (other architects, contractors); and escalate to the sponsor or resource manager who has authority to make resource allocation decisions across projects.
**Why not A:** Ignoring the conflict puts the critical path at risk. If the architect is unavailable during a period when critical path activities require their expertise, the project will be delayed. Ignoring known resource conflicts is not responsible project management.
**Why not B:** Removing the architect entirely may not be feasible if their specialized skills are essential. The goal is to resolve the resource conflict, not eliminate the resource. Removing critical expertise could create larger problems than the scheduling conflict.
**Why not C:** Automatically delaying the project accepts a negative outcome without exploring alternatives. Schedule compression, resource negotiation, and scope adjustment may all provide solutions that avoid or minimize project delay.
Key Concept
This question covers Demonstrate an understanding of a project management plan schedule under Demonstrate an understanding of a project management plan schedule (Predictive, Plan-Based Methodologies).
All 1,500+ CAPM questions are free
Sign up to track your progress, see detailed analytics, and get personalized study recommendations.
Sign Up Free