CAPM Practice: Demonstrate an understanding of a project management plan schedule
Question 12 of 85 in Demonstrate an understanding of a project management plan schedule
Pick an answer below — you'll get the explanation instantly, no signup.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: Performing activities in parallel that were originally planned sequentially
Explanation
Fast tracking overlaps activities that were originally planned sequentially — performing them in parallel or with overlapping timelines. This reduces duration but increases risk (rework may be needed if a predecessor changes). Fast tracking is only possible when activities have some independence or lead time can be accommodated.
**Why not A:** Hiring more experienced workers to complete activities faster describes a form of crashing (adding or upgrading resources), not fast tracking. Fast tracking is specifically about changing the sequence of activities to allow parallel execution, not about resource changes.
**Why not B:** Substituting cheaper materials to reduce procurement lead time is a procurement optimization strategy, not a recognized schedule compression technique. Fast tracking addresses activity sequencing, not material selection or procurement strategies.
**Why not D:** Reducing scope to shorten duration is scope reduction (sometimes called de-scoping), not fast tracking. Fast tracking maintains the original scope but changes how activities are sequenced. Scope reduction requires formal change control approval and changes what the project delivers.
Key Concept
This question covers Demonstrate an understanding of a project management plan schedule under Demonstrate an understanding of a project management plan schedule (Predictive, Plan-Based Methodologies).
All 1,500+ CAPM questions are free
Sign up to track your progress, see detailed analytics, and get personalized study recommendations.
Sign Up Free